|
There are several reasons:
I. The predominant one is today's maturing of management
as a professional function. This development brought about a realization
that the success of an organization depends largely on the quality
and performance of its people. The organization with the best executives
is most likely to move ahead of its competitors. Therefore, ways
had to be found to develop the best from within and recruit the
best from outside.
II. The gradual understanding that executive search firms
are the main means of bringing about better utilization of scarce
executive talent. There is no way that a frustrated executive can
advertise his desire for a bigger job that does not exist for him
in his present organization. Nor can companies and other organizations
usually broadcast their confidential executive requirements. Search
firms become the much needed instrument for bringing underutilized
executives into organizations in which their talents could be more
effectively applied.
III. Confidentiality; the organization may not want a decision
or strategy to be known either internally or within the business
community. Under those circumstances a third party must do the searching,
protecting the identity of the organization.
IV. Costliness of errors in executive selection became increasingly
evident. The wrong hire may hinder or even cripple an organization.
The time required to indoctrinate an executive into a new position,
give them sufficient time to demonstrate their effectiveness, the
agonizing, time-consuming decision to replace them, and the costly
internal or external recruiting process all over again have taught
some hard lessons. Such events led to the recognition of the need
for professional assistance in finding the right person for the
right position.
V. Experience with executive search in turn brought about
a better understanding of the special skills needed to find and
bring into the organization the right executive for the vacant position.
Among these are:
|